![]() |
|||||
| INSIGHTS NEWSLETTERS Fall 2004, Vol. 17, No 2 Spring 2004, Vol. 17, No.1 Spring 2003, Vol. 16, No. 1 April 2002, Vol. 15, No. 1 Nov 2001, Vol. 14, No. 2 April 2001, Vol. 14, No. 1 May 2000, Vol 13, Num 1 Oct 1999, Vol 12, Num 2 May 1999, Vol 12, Num 1 Nov 1998, Vol 11, Num 2 Jan 1998, Vol 11, Num 1 Feb 1997, Vol 10, Num 1 Sept 1996, Vol 9, Num 2 August 1995, Vol 8, Num 2 Sept 1993, Vol 6, Num 2 October 1990, Vol 4, Num 2 WELCOME TO PI Info About PI Why a Prosthodontist? Meet Our Doctors Research Programs What's New At PI? Free Video Offer DENTAL TREATMENT Dental Implants Treatment Options Prosthesis Types Bone Grafting Dental Implants & Congenital Deformities Bad Breath Orthodontic Treatment Combined with Procera Crowns HEALTH-ISSUES AND DENTISTRY Bone Loss and Aging Heart Illness & Dentistry Snoring/Sleep Apnea Osteoporosis Cancer Information Drugs and Dentistry Smoking & Implants Other Medical |
|||||
|
Volume 14, Number 2 -- November 2001
TEETH IN A DAYTM in the Upper Jaw TJ Balshi and GJ Wolfinger Introduction Patients who gag easily or are unable to wear removable dentures are primary candidates when considering a TEETH IN A DAYTM rehabilitation. The protocol for an implant supported non-removable prosthesis in just one day, which we call TEETH IN A DAYTM, began nearly eight years ago at Pi Dental Center with immediately loading dental implants in edentulous mandibles. These rehabilitations were successful in the mandibular arch because of the superior quality and bone density in the anterior of the lower jaw. |
|||||
| The following patient treatment is an example of TEETH IN A DAYTM for the upper jaw: A 54-year-old female patient was referred with a history of over 30 years of crowns and fixed partial dentures in both the maxilla and mandible (Fig 1). These restorations were supported by endodontically treated teeth that continued to deteriorate due to a compromised dentition and parafunctional habits. Over time the parafunctional habits of bruxing and clenching were responsible for multiple root fractures and the loss of numerous teeth (Fig 3). Her primary concern was to avoid wearing a complete removable maxillary denture. The patient's medical history indicated good general health. Medications used at the time of treatment included Zyrtec for allergies, Vioxx for pain, Evista to supplement hormone replacement therapy and Periostat to control periodontal inflammation. She did report having sensitivity to penicillin. In evaluating her dental condition, the maxillary arch was in a state of complete deterioration (Fig 4a,b,c). The only signs of stability in the maxilla were three Brånemark osseointegrated implants that had been successfully placed in 1992 in the right bicuspid and molar area. The remaining natural dentition in the maxilla (teeth #'s 6-15) had completely deteriorated and the patient was experiencing cosmetic and esthetic compromise due to the discoloration and fracture of these provisional restorations. The mandibular dentition suffered with failing traditional fixed prosthodontics in the left posterior and the loss of molars on the right side (Fig 5). |
|||||
|
More Information Home | Write Us | REQUEST INFORMATION To make an appointment for an evaluation, call: 1-800-PI-TEAM-5 All information is intended for your general knowledge only and is not a substitute for dental or medical advice or treatment for specific dental or medical conditions. You should seek prompt dental and medical care for any specific health issues. See disclaimer. Copyright 2008 Pi Dental Center (Prosthodontics Intermedica). |
|||||